IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Shamim Ahmed, J
C.Sivankutty – Appellant
Versus
S.Cross Arul Raj – Respondent
O R D E R
Heard Mr.M.Mithun, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, Mr.K.Muthurakken, learned counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of the 1st Respondent and Mr.M.Karunanithi, learned Government Advocate , who accepts notice on behalf of the 2nd Respondent. Therefore, no further notice is required to be issued to the Respondents.
2. This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner to set aside the condition imposed in Crl.M.P.No.1475 of 2024 in C.A.No.127 of 2023 dated 04.03.2024 passed by the learned Principal District Sessions Judge, Nagercoil.
3.The facts of the case in a nutshell, led to filing of this Criminal Revision Petition and necessary for disposal of the same, are as follows:-
a) The Petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act, by the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track) Court, Nagercoil in S.T.C.No.197/2017 by the judgment dated 26.06.2023, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay a sum of Rs.23,00,000/-, as compensation to the complainant. As against the same, the Petitioner filed a Criminal Appeal in Crl.A.No.127 of 2023 along with a petition for suspension of sentence in Crl.M.P.No.70
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.