Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. Ilanthiriyan, J
Kamatchi Shanker Arumugam – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu School Education Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition seeks enforcement of child protection guidelines. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. corporal punishment rejected; safe environments mandated. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. timeliness in addressing grievances emphasized. (Para 5) |
| 4. grievance addressed, compensation not warranted. (Para 7) |
| 5. court dismisses the writ petition. (Para 9) |
(R3 to R5 are suo motu impleaded as per order dated 23.02.2024 in W.P.No.4507 of 2024) ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, (2) directing the first respondent to implement the “Guidelines for Elimination of Corporal Punishment in Schools (GECP)” provided by National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) or any other equally efficient set of guidelines and protocol to eliminate corporal punishment, across all schools in Tamilnadu, under the Control of Tamilnadu School Education Department, with immediate effect disseminating necessary training, periodic (weekly & monthly) reminders to teachers and students, so that the petitioner's daughter can learn in an ethical environment. To ensure compliance by respondents, they request that this Court include a compliance c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
