Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
M.Michael – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Land Administration Ezhilagam, Chennai – Respondent
W.P.No.33786 of 2025 | W.M.P.No.37914 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trespassers lack standing to demand government land reclassification. (Para 1) |
| 2. the petition is dismissed due to lack of merit. (Para 2) |
Petitioner, who is a rank encroacher/trespasser, is seeking mandamus for re-classification of catchment area as government land for being developed for allotment.
2. Petition is completely misconceived and therefore, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim application is also dismissed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
