Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy, J
S.RAMESH S/O SIVALOGAM – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for rightful ownership based on intestate succession. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. government's duty in property disputes and registration. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. existence of fraud negates the legitimacy of power of attorney. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. high court's authority to cancel documents arising from forgery. (Para 8 , 9) |
Order
The prayer, in this Petition is for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of mandamus, directing the second respondent to take steps and to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner's dated 17.06.2023 within a time frame.
2. Mr.N.Srinivasan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's father had passed away in the year 1995, leaving behind him, the petitioner and his sister as the legal heirs; that the petitioner's father, during his life-time had purchased a property situated at Saidapet Taluk, Chengalpattu District; that since the petitioner's father died intestate, leaving no Will, the petitioner and his sister have vested right over the property and the petitioner's sister also executed a Release Deed dated 03.07.2023 in favour of the petitioner, and therefore, the petitioner is the absolute
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
