SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 55424

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
MARIMUTHU – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR NAMAKKAL DISTRICT – Respondent
Writ Petition No.33222 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.S.Saravanan, Mr.C.Prabakaran
For the Respondents: Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai, Mr.G.Velu, Mr.S.Balaji

Court instructed authorities to conduct a peace committee meeting regarding social boycott issues affecting temple participation.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ of Mandamus - Petition for direction against social boycott experienced by petitioner's family, ensuring their participation in temple festival - Court directed authorities to conduct a peace committee meeting and provide resolution within eight weeks. (Para 4)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner's family faced social boycott from another group in the village and was barred from participating in the temple festival, leading to this writ petition after their representation was ignored.

Findings of Court:
The court instructed the concerned authorities to conduct a peace committee meeting to resolve the issues arising between the petitioner's family and the villagers.

Issues: The main issue involved the social boycott and relevant actions needed to resolve the dispute regarding the temple festival participation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity for a peace committee meeting to address disputes and ensure communal harmony in the village.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. direction for peace committee meeting to resolve disputes (Para 1 , 4)
2. social boycott due to community dispute (Para 2 , 3)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to

6 to take appropriate action against the private respondents for the social boycotting of the petitioner's family in the village, based on the representation of the petitioner dated 3.3.2025 and enable the petitioner's family to worship the Mariyamman Temple situated at Korakuttai village, Erayamangalam Post, Thiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District by receiving the contribution for the festival from the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's family members were socially boycoted by the other group from participating in temple festival, thereby the petitioner made a representation to take action as against the social boycott, however, the same was not considered, hence the present Writ Petition.

3. Per contra, the learned counsels on the side of the respondents 1 to 6 would submit that there was a temple dispute beween the petitioner's family and rest of the village people and the petitioner was named as 'A' party and one Ravi and Rajendran/ private respondents are named as 'B' Party, on 24.02.2025, at about 7.30 p.m., there was a dispute with regard to the festival of the temple and the petitioner and the opposite group attacked each other, thereby criminal case is registered as against Ravi and Rajendran and others in Crime No.16 of 2025 for offences punishable under Sections 191(2) 296(b) and 115(2) and 133 of BNSS Act. Further, Ravi and Rajendran made a complaint as against the petitioner and a case has been registered against the petitioner in Crime No.17 of 2025 for offences punishable under Section 296(b) and 351(2) BNSS. Thereafter, Inspector of police referred the matter to the Revenue Divisional Officer for conducting peace comittee meeting vide his letter dated 22.03.2025. Therefore, pleaded that peace committee meeting will be conducted by the Revenue Divisional Officer cum Judicial magistrate and appropriate orders will be passed.

4. Considering the above said submissions made on either side, this Court is inclined to direct the 3rd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the report of Inpsector of Police, Molsi Police Station, Namakkal District dated 22.03.2025 by conducting peace committee meeting and conclude the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top