SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 55473

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
M/s Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M/s Aarya Engineering – Respondent
Arb Appln Nos. 1062 & 1063 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellant(s): Mr.V.Balasubramani
For the Respondent(s):

Court affirmed the necessity of asset seizure in loan default cases under Arbitration Act provisions, emphasizing the applicant's rights to recover due amounts.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9 - Applications filed for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to seize vehicles due to loan defaults - Required appointment justified considering prima facie case established for repossession as per loan agreements. (Paras 1, 2, 5, 6)

(B) Arrears of installments - Applicant claims Rs.7,88,475/- and Rs.6,52,378/- in defaults along with charges under respective loans - Court allows repossession upon notification of due payment. (Paras 3, 4, 6)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, a non-banking financial institution, filed applications based on defaults by the respondents in loan repayments for equipment financing. The debts and respective loan account details were elaborated and a request for Advocate Commissioner appointment was made to recover assets.

Findings of Court:
Court found that a prima facie case was established for appointing an Advocate Commissioner for asset recovery, authorizing takeover with necessary conditions for the respondents to reclaim once dues were settled.

Issues: The issue addressed was the appropriateness of asset seizure based on loan defaults and the adherence to procedural requirements of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided that a prima facie case existed for taking necessary actions under the loan agreements to secure repayment, emphasizing the applicant’s rights under defaults.

Result: Applications are disposed of in favor of the applicant for asset recovery under specified conditions.

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction and request for assistance in asset recovery. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of loan defaults and amounts due. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)

ORDER

These applications have been filed for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to seize the vehicles from the respondent and to hand it over to the applicant.

2.The applicant filed the earlier applications in A.Nos.509 and 510 of

2025 and an order came to be passed in these applications on 25.03.2025 and the same is extracted hereunder:

These applications have been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 , seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to seize the equipments / machineries morefully described in the schedule to the respective Judges Summons from the respondents or wherever it is available. 2. The applicant is a Non Banking Financial Institution. The applicant and the respondents are one and the same in both these applications. The respondents have availed loan from the applicant under separate Loan cum Hypothecation Agreements, they are dated 25.02.2022 and 22.11.2022 for the purchase of respective equipments / machineries. According to the applicant, the respondents have committed default in re-payment of the loan. 3. According to the applicant, insofar as Arb. A. No.509 of 2025 is concerned, the respondents have paid as on date only 30 installments out of the total 36 installments payable by them. According to the applicant, the respondents have made payments belatedly. The applicant has also recalled the loan granted to the respondents through their loan recall notice dated 24.01.2025. Despite the same the respondents failed to settle the loan account. The applicant has filed statement of account dated 24.01.2025 along with Arb. Appln. No.509 of 2025, which reveals that a sum of Rs.7,88,475/- is due and payable by the respondents to the applicant, which includes future installments, arrears of installments, penal interest and other charges payable as per the contract. As on date, the respondents are in arrears of 6 installments, which works out to Rs.7,88,475/-.

4. According to the applicant, insofar as Arb. A. No.510 of 2025 is concerned, there were two Loans A/c. Nos. viz., PR00041226 and PR00041227 and the details pertaining to the said Loan A/c. Nos. are stated hereunder :-

a) With respect to Loan A/c. No.PR00041226, the respondents have paid as on date only 21 installments out of the total 27 installments payable by them. According to the applicant, the respondents have made payments belatedly. The applicant has also recalled the loan granted to the respondents through their loan recall notice dated 24.01.2025. Despite the same the respondents failed to settle the loan account. The applicant has filed statement of account, dated 24.01.2025 along with Arb. Appln. No.510 of 2025, which reveals that a sum of Rs.6,52,378/- is due and payable by the respondents to the applicant, which includes future installments, arrears of installments, penal interest and other charges payable as per the contract. As on date, the respondents are in arrears of 6 installments, which works out to Rs.6,52,378/-

b) With respect to Loan A/c. No.PR00041227, the respondents have paid only 21 installments out of the total 27 installments payable by them. According to the applicant, the respondents have made payments belatedly. The applicant has also recalled the loan granted to the respondents through their loan recall notice dated 24.01.2025. Despite the same the respondents failed to settle the loan account. The applicant has filed statement of account, dated 24.01.2025 along with Arb. Appln. No.510 of 2025, which reveals that a sum of Rs.3,36,329/- is due and payable by the respondents to the applicant, which includes future installments, arrears of installments, penal interest and other charges payable as per the contract. As on date, the respondents are in arrears of 6 installments, which works out to Rs.3,36,329/-

5. The applicant is empowered to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top