Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MRS.J.NISHA BANU, MRS.S.SRIMATHY, JJ
Masilamani – Appellant
Versus
Loganathan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assignments and their cancellations under land reforms act. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. arguments on legal standing and cancellation process. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. court observations regarding nature of assignments. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. statutory framework of land reforms. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 5. court's findings on retention of lands. (Para 39 , 40) |
| 6. final ruling on appeals. (Para 76 , 77 , 78) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
J.NISHA BANU. J.
These intra-court appeals are filed against the common order dated 23.06.2022 passed in W.P.(MD) Nos. 23474 and 23475 of 2018. Since the issues involved in these writ appeals are one and the same, they are taken up and heard together, and a common order is being passed.
2.The appellant in W.A.(MD) No.695 and 1117 of 2024 is a third party to the said writ proceedings and was not arrayed as a party to the writ petitions. She had purchased the subject property for consideration from one th G.D.Narendra-the 5 respondent in the said writ petitions in W.P.(MD) No. 23474 and 23475 of 2018. Therefore, she filed miscellaneous petitions in C.M.P.(MD) No.11550 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD) No.4312 of 2024 seeking leave to sue
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
