2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 80291
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.Swaminathan, J
Jesy Arulappan – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar, Kalkulam Taluk, Thuckalay, Kanyakumari District – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.15470 of 2015
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Ramakrishnan
For the Respondents: Mr.M.Lingadurai, Special Government Pleader
Legal heirship certificates do not confer legal rights and must comply with personal law governing inheritance; hence, a mother-in-law cannot claim heirship under Christian law.
Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Legal heirship certificate - Inclusion of names and legal rights - The court clarified that a legal heirship certificate, issued by a Tahsildar, does not confer legal status as a heir under personal laws and does not equate to a succession certificate under the Indian Succession Act. Deletion of a name from the certificate must follow legal principles governing heirship. (Paras 3, 5, 6)
(B) Personal Law - The distinction in the status of heirs under Christian law and Hindu law; specifically, a mother is not considered a legal heir under the Indian Succession Act for Christians. (Para 5)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought deletion of her mother-in-law's name from the legal heirship certificate of her deceased husband, arguing it contravenes personal law.
Findings of Court:
The mention in a legal heir certificate does not confirm entitlement to property; legal rights must be established as per law or by a will.
Issues: The primary issue was the legal effect of names included in a legal heirship certificate versus rights established by personal law.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reinforced the distinction between a legal heirship certificate and an actual acknowledgment of heirs' status, emphasizing adherence to relevant personal laws in determining heirship.
Result: Writ petition disposed of.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal heir certificate reflects relationships under personal law. (Para 2) |
| 2. court clarified significance of legal heirship under guidelines. (Para 3) |
| 3. legal heirship governed by personal laws; certificate does not grant rights. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent.
2. The petitioner's husband passed away on 28.07.2013.
The petitioner applied for issuance of legal heir certificate to the Tahsildar, Kalkulam Taluk. While issuing the legal heir certificate, the Tahsildar included the name of the second respondent who is none other than the mother of the petitioner's husband. Seeking deletion of her mother-in-law's name, the present writ petition has been filed.
3. The nomenclature of the certificate no doubt gives an impression that the persons named in the certificate are the legal heirs of the deceased. However, it is not so. The Hon'ble Full Bench in P. Venkatachalam and Ors. Vs. The Tahsildar Kumarapalayam Taluk , Namakkal and Ors. (MANU/TN/6066/2022) had held as follows:-
“65. To sum up, our answers to the questions formulated in paragraph 10, (supra), are as under:
A. Legal heirship is a status governed by the respective personal law of parties through various statutes. The certificates issued by the Tahsildar amount to nothing more than a relationship certificate reflecting the opinion of the Tahsildar as to the relationship of the applicant and others named therein with the deceased. Consequently, the certificate issued by the Tahsildar does not affect the legal right of any party and has no bearing on the status of a legal heir which is conferred on an individual under his/her personal law.
...
C. Consequently, a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution will not lie to direct the Tahsildar to issue a legal heirship certificate contrary to the terms of a circular. An exception to the aforesaid principle is where the circular, ex-facie, suffers from the vice of arbitrariness or perversity or runs counter to any provision of law. In such cases, it is open to the Court to ignore the circular and grant such relief(s)
as may be permissible in law.
...
E. A legal heirship certificate issued by a Tahsildar cannot be equated to a succession certificate issued by a Court under Part X of the Indian Succession Act , 1925, in respect of the debt or securities. ... ”
4. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader produced a copy of the guidelines issued on 28.09.2022. It can be seen therefrom that the legal heir certificate of the deceased (in the case of a married person) will include only the following persons (along with their living status):-
1. Father of deceased 2. Mother of deceased 3. Spouse of deceased 4. Son(s) of deceased
5. Daughter(s) of deceased
5. I am conscious that the parties before me are Christians.
Though as per Hindu Law, mother is considered as one of the class-I legal heirs, that is not the case in respect of Christians. A mother is not a legal heir as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act . The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Agnes @ Karpaga Devi Vs. Pauline @ Pauline Iruthaya Mary (A.S.No.596 of 2019 vide order dated 07.11.2023) had held as follows:-
“ 8. As per the rules under Section 33 &
33-A where the Christian dies intestate leaving behind a widow and lineal descendants 1/3rd of the property would go to the widow and remaining 2/3rd will go to the lineal descendants. If an intestate dies leaving behind a widow and a kindred 1/3rd of the property will be taken by the widow and the remaining will go the kindred. If there is neither lineal descendants nor kindred, the entire property will go to the widow. Section 33 -A provides for certain rules regarding succession and we do not see any situation where provisions of 33-
A would apply in this case.
9. Section 43 of the Indian Succession Act deals with Distributio