Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.PUGALENDHI, J
Tamizhan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rationale for seeking bail related to sc/st act. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. context of the offence and related issues. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's decision and directive on bail application. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
The petitioners are accused in Crime No.317 of 2025, on the file of the second respondent Police. The said case was registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2) (va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Therefore, the petitioners have filed this petition seeking a direction to the Special Court concerned to dispose of their bail applications on the date of their surrender.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is an elected councilor of Genguvarpatti Town Panchayat and he has received an information that a Thaar road was being laid in 12th Ward of Genguvarpatti Town Panchayat and therefore, he along with the Chairman went to the spot and questioned the JCB driver, for which, the petitioners along with A1 came to the spot and abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also by degrading his caste name. Hence, the case.
3.The learned
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
