SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 55782

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. Balaji, J
Pannerselvam – Appellant
Versus
Dheivanai – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. R. Suryaprakash
For the Respondents: Mr. R. Ramesh

ORDER

The revision petitioners claim to be the husband and wife. The respondent herein claiming herself to be the wife of the first petitioner has initiated Domestic Violence Complaint against both the petitioners and the petitioners have come forward with the present revision to strike of the Domestic Violence Complaint in D.V.C. No.11 of 2024.

2. I have heard Mr.R. Suryaprakash, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.R. Ramesh, learned counsel for the respondent.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that the petitioners are happily married husband and wife and with an ulterior motive and false allegations, the respondent claiming as if she is the wife of the first petitioner has initiated maintenance claim in M.C. No.1 of 2021, which was pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi and subsequent to transfer it has been re-numbered as M.C. No.20 of 2022.

4. The petitioners have stoutly denied the matrimonial relationship between the first petitioner and the respondent and according to them, the first petitioner and the respondent have never been husband and wife and they never lived together in any relationship.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top