Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.PUGALENDHI, J
P.Ayyakannu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner faced systemic obstruction from authorities. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner previously sought relief from the supreme court. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. counter affidavit presents allegations against petitioner's methods. (Para 7) |
| 4. right to protest as a fundamental right. (Para 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 5. rights come with responsibilities and restrictions. (Para 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 6. court notes the need for lawful protest regulations. (Para 13) |
| 7. court's balance of rights and legal compliance. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
The petitioner, Ayyakannu, is the President of an organisation formed for the welfare of farmers and for promoting river water linkage. He has approached this Court seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents in any manner from interfering with the free movement of the petitioner and his members to go to New Delhi.
2.Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner and his members travelled to New Delhi on more than one occasion, but they were deboarded from the train despite holding valid tickets. In September 2024, when they boarded the train at Trichy Junction bound for New Delhi, they were deboarded at Chengalpattu Railway Station.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
