Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. R.N. Manjula, J
Selvam @ Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against trial judgement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. circumstances of the prosecution case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 20) |
| 3. arguments and legal representation. (Para 7 , 8 , 22) |
| 4. witness testimonies concerning the event. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 26) |
| 5. observations on the aftermath. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. legal reasoning about charge framing. (Para 21 , 23 , 24 , 27) |
| 7. final conclusions and outcome. (Para 25 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGEMENT
This appeal has been filed challenging the Judgement of the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madurai, dated 24.10.2017 in S.C.No.97 of 2014.
2. The appellant is the sole accused, who has been charged and tried for the offence under Section 302 IPC , however found guilty by the learned trial Judge for the offence under Section 306 and convicted and sentenced to undergo 5 years RI and to pay a fine of Rs.2,500/-, in default to undergo 3 months SI.
3. The case of the prosecution as per the records is that the deceased Sundari was the eldest daughter of the defacto complainant. The accused and the deceased married each other and they have been residing at Hosur. The relationship between the couple was not cordial as th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
