Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. Balaji, J
S.Arul – Appellant
Versus
Royal Enfield Motorcycles Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revision petition challenges docket order. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's observations on jurisdiction and appeal. (Para 2 , 6 , 8 , 20) |
| 3. court's limitation on setting aside exparte orders. (Para 7 , 17) |
| 4. foundation of the court's decision. (Para 9 , 21 , 24) |
| 5. exploration of alternative remedies available. (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 6. existence of effective alternate remedy within the consumer protection act. (Para 11 , 19) |
| 7. revision petition challenges a summary rejection of appeal. (Para 25) |
| 8. final decision detailed. (Para 26) |
ORDER
This revision petition has been filed challenging the docket order dated 22.01.2025 passed in F.A.Sr.No.2014 of 2024 by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Chennai, summarily rejecting the appeal filed by the revision petitioner at the unnumbered stage.
2. I have heard the learned counsel on either side and I have also perused the materials available on record.
3. The order impugned in the present revision is as follows:-
“No representation for appellant. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for proper compliance or for rejection (finally).
Today when the matter was called at first calling, the appellant w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
