Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. Justice R.N. Manjula, J
Paranthaman – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case summary leading to conviction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding contradictions in testimonies. (Para 6 , 7 , 19) |
| 3. details of the occurrence and victim's condition. (Para 9 , 10 , 18) |
| 4. assessment of victim's testimony and corroboration. (Para 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 5. outcome of the appeal. (Para 28) |
JUDGMENT
This criminal appeal has been preferred challenging the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul, dated 06.04.2018, made in Spl.S.C.No.9 of 2016.
2. The appellant is the sole accused, who was found guilty for the offences under Sections 3 76(1) and 366 IPC and convicted and sentenced to undergo 7 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of one year for the offence under Section 3 76(1) : and to undergo 3 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of six months for the offence under Section 3 66 . The sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.10.2015, at about 08.00, pm., when the victim child was going from her house to her relati
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
