IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
Lucas Daniel Raj – Appellant
Versus
Pertreesia Maria – Respondent
COMMON ORDER
Both the criminal revisions cases have been filed against the order of payment out thereby allowing the petition seeking payment out and dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner to transfer the amount which was already deposited to the credit of MC.No.254 of 2020.
2. The petitioner had married the respondent. Thereafter, the respondent left the matrimonial house and she was living separately. Therefore, she could not maintain herself and filed petition for maintenance in MC.No.254 of 2020. It was allowed by the trial court, thereby ordering a sum of Rs.25,000/- as monthly maintenance in favour of the respondent payable by the petitioner. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred criminal revision case before this Court in Crl.RC.No.1089 of 2023 and the same was allowed with the following directions:
i)The revision petition is allowed and the order in M.C.
No.254 of 2022, dated 28.02.2023, passed by the trial court is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the file of the III Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai:-
ii)The interim maintenance ordered at Rs.25,000/- is reduced and the petitioner/husband is directed to pay interim maintenance to the res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.