MADRAS HIGH COURT
V Vinodraj – Appellant
Versus
The Controller of Exams Advocate - M/S S THANKA SIVAN, T UMA SIVAN,R SUNDARA KAMESH,MARTHANDAN FOR R3,MR M VIJAYAKUMAR FOR R1 AND R – Respondent
WRIT PETITION 9621/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.07.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.No.9621 of 2018
and
W.M.P.No.11537 of 2018
Mr.V.Vinodraj
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Controller of Exams,
Anna University,
Sardar Patel Road,
Old Highways Building,
Guindy, Chennai-600 025.
2. The Registrar,
Anna University,
Sardar Patel Road,
Old Highways Building,
Guindy, Chennai-600 025.
3. The Principal,
Vel Tech High Tech,
Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College,
42 & 60, Avadi-Vel Tech Road,
Avadi, Chennai-600 062.
.. Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct
the respondents to condone the lack of attendance of the
petitioner and thereby permit the petitioner to continue the
B.E. Computer Science Engineering Course in the Academic Year
2017 to 2018 and complete 6th Semester.
For petitioner : Mr.M.Velmurugan
For respondents : Mr.M.Vijayakumar for RR-1 and 2
Mr.S.Thankasivan for R-3
ORDER
The petitioner has come forward with the above Writ
Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct
the respondents to condone the lack of attendance of the
petitioner and thereby permit the petitioner to continue the
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
B.E. Computer Science Engineering Course in the Academic Year
2017 - 2018 and complete 6th Semester.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he is pursuing
Computer Science Engineering in the third respondent-College and
presently studying III year of the course, i.e. 6th Semester.
He was injured in a motor bike accident, which caused fracture
on his left wrist and bruises all over his body and also
injuries on his knees and he was also suffering from pain and
fever due to the said fracture. The Doctor advised complete bed
rest. Therefore, he was unable to attend the classes for the
period between 14.02.2018 and 17.03.2018. His overall attendance
is only 58%. In support of his absence, the petitioner had
produced Medical Certificate to the third respondent-College and
requested for condonation of his absence and shortfall in
attendance.
3. It is further stated by the petitioner that as per the
requirement of the first respondent, a student should have 75%
of attendance to write the exams. The lack of attendance can be
condoned if the same is not below 65%. It is the stand of the
petitioner that as he has attendance of 58%, due to medical
emergency, the attendance can be taken/relaxed to 69%, which is
eligible for condonation, by payment of penalty as prescribed by
the first respondent-University. It is the grievance of the
petitioner that the third respondent is neither accepting the
absence due to medical emergency, nor permitting the petitioner
to continue the course of III year any further. Hence, the
petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for the relief stated
supra.
4. The respondents 1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit
stating that in order to allow certain unavoidable reasons such
as medical/participation in sports/personal, the student is
expected to attend at least 75% of the classes during any
Semester commencing from 1st Semester. The student shall secure
not less than 75% of overall attendance taking into account the
total number of 450 periods in a Semester within 90 working days
in all courses put together attended by a candidate as against
the total number of periods in all courses offered during the
Semester. However, a candidate who secures overall attendance
between 65% and 74% that current Semester due to medical reasons
(prolonged
hospitalisation/accident/specific
illness
/
participation in sports events) may be permitted to appear for
the current Semester examinations, subject to the condition that
the candidate shall sub