SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
D.Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Secretary – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/s S Doraisamy', '', 'M P rAJAVELAYUTHAM', 'D RAJKUMAR', 'M P VAIRAKKANNAN', 'K A PRABAHARAN']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Special Original Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Nineteenth day of November Two Thousand Eighteen

PRESENT

THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN

AND

THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

WP NO.30212 OF 2018

AND WMP.NO.35271 OF 2018

D.DINESH KUMAR [PETITIONER IN BOTH THE PETITIONS]

Vs

1 THE CHIEF SECRETARY, [RESPONDENTS IN BOTH THE PETITIONS]

STATE OF TAMIL NADU, SECRETARIAT,

CHENNAI 600 009.

2 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETAY,

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STATE OF TAMIL NADU,

SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI 600 009

3 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

HIGHWAYS AND MINOR PORTS DEPARTMENT, STATE

OF TAMIL NADU, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI 600 009

4 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

TAMIL DEVELOPMENT AND INFORMATION DEPARTMENT,

STATE OF TAMIL NADU, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI

600 009.

5 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,

REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DIVISION -I,

CHEPAUK, CHENNAI 600 005.

Writ Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

praying that in these circumstances stated therein and in the

respective affidavits filed therewith the High Court will be

pleased to issue a Writ of Mand

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top