Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr.R.N.MANJULA, J
Jeyakumar – Appellant
Versus
State through The Inspector of Police, Vangal Police Station, Karur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on section 304(b) ipc for dowry death. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. argument for appeal provided by both parties. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. evidence timeline establishes lack of immediate cruelty before death. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. investigative inconsistencies raise doubt on allegations. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. presumption under law requires clear evidence of prior cruelty. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. doubts raised about motives and circumstances leading to suicide. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. overturning the conviction based on lack of sufficient evidence. (Para 24 , 25) |
JUDGEMENT
This appeal has been filed challenging the Judgement of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Karur, dated 28.09.2018, in S.C.No.55 of 2018.
2. The appellant is the sole accused, who has been found guilty by the learned trial Judge for the offence under Section 304 (B) IPC and convicted and sentenced to undergo 7 years RI.
3. The case of the prosecution as per the records is that the accused and the deceased Sarala are husband and wife and their marriage was solemnized on 13.04.2014. Their marriage is an arranged marriage. Immediately after the marriage, the accused har
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
