IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
A.Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
K.Prabhakaran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute regarding property possession. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties concerning sales. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court discussion on boundary evidence over measurements. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final order regarding compensation and settlement. (Para 14) |
J U D G M E N T
The dispute is with regard to 8 cents. According to the appellant, he is in possession and enjoyment of 8 cents, after selling a portion of the properties to the respondent, in the year 1985. The appellant sold only 2 acres of lands to the Vendors in 1984 and he retained 8 cents on the South East side. The remaining extent of 1 acre and 32 cents which is adjacent to the disputed land was sold to another third party that is the Eastern side of the disputed land.
2.The learned counsel for the respondent contended that though the extent was granted in 2 acres of lands but with a specific four boundaries the land was conveyed by the appellant to original purchaser Kannammal of the year 1984.
3.The respondent's father purchased the property from the original vendor Kannammal under a Sale Deed in the year 1985 to an extent of 2 acres with specific four boundaries. Thereafter, from 1995 onwards, a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.