MADRAS HIGH COURT
PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT – Appellant
Versus
ESTATE OF IRUSSAMMAL – Respondent
CMP 18331/2017
['M/S R THIAGARAJAN', '', 'VASUDHA THIAGARAJAN', 'M/S T RAVICHANDRAN', '', 'I MALAR', 'M/S I AROKIYASAMY', 'K YOGESHWARI', 'VIDE COURT ORD DT']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Thirteenth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
and
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
CMP.Nos.18331 & 18332 of 2017
in OSA.No.296 of 2017
PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT [PETITIONER IN BOTH THE
OF CONSTRUCTIONS, REP BY ITS
PETITIONS]
PROPRIETRIX.SEETA RAMARAJU, 10,
FIRST FLOOR, 829 ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 2.
Vs
1 ESTATE OF IRUSSAMMAL [RESPONDENTS IN BOTH THE
REP BY HER ADMINISTER P. ANBUCHEZHIAN,
PETITIONS]
NO.50, 59TH STREET, 10TH SECTOR,
K.K. NAGAR, CHENNAI - 78.
2 ESTATE OF ALAMELU
REP BY HER ADMINISTER P. ANBUCHEZHIAN,
NO.50, 59TH STREET, 10TH SECTOR,
K.K. NAGAR, CHENNAI - 78.
3 MRS.KAMATCHI
4 C. MUNUSAMY
5 MRS.CHINNAMMAL
6 MRS.GOVINDAMMAL
7 C. RADHA
8 C. KRISHNAN
14 KARAKAIPUDUCHERRY ROAD, URAPPAKKAM,
CHEGALPET TK, KANCHEEPURAM DIST. REP BY
THEIR POWER AGENT P. ANBUCHEZHIAN.
9 P. ANBUCHEZHIAN
10 S. PERUMAL
11 R. DHANASEKARAN
12 C. SHANKAR
13 VIJAYA
14 CHITRA
15 VALLI
16 ANGAMMAL
[RESPONDENT 11 TO 16 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 17.03.2006
IN APPLN.NO.776/2000 DELAY IN AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT VIDE
APPLN.NO.1996/06 DATED 12.06.2006 IN CS.NO.41/2003]
Petitions praying that in the circumstances stated
therein and in the respective affidavits filed therewith the
High Court will be pleased to
(i)Pass an order of interim injunction restraining the
respondent 1 to 16 or their agents, servants, men or anyone
claiming under or through them and/or authorised by them
from encumbering, alienating or dealing with the suit
schedule mentioned property, more fully described in the
schedule appended to the judges summons, either by way of
sale, mortgage, lease, joint development or in any other
manner, (in CMP.No.18331/2017)and
(ii)Pass an order of interim injunction restraining the
respondent 1 to 16 or their agents, servants, men or anyone
claiming under or through them and/or authorised by them
from putting up any constructions and/or altering the
physical features of the suit schedule B & C mentioned
properties, more fully described in the schedule appended to
the judges summons, (in CMP.No.18332/2017)pending disposal
of the above OSA.No.296/2017 respectively.
SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY XEROX COPY ATTACHED
Order : These petitions coming on for orders upon
perusing the petitions and the respective affidavits filed
in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of
M/S.R.THIAGARAJAN, Advocate for the petitioner in both the
petitions and of M/S.T.RAVICHANDRAN, Advocate for the
respondent in both the petitions the court made the
following order:-
(Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)
The plaintiff, aggrieved over the dismissal of the suit
for specific performance, has preferred the present appeal.
Pending the appeal, these two petitions have been filed,
seeking interim injunction.
2. C.M.P.No.18331 of 2017 has been filed against the
alleged alienation and C.M.P.No.18332 of 2017 has been filed
against the proposed alteration of physical features.
3.Learned counsel appearing for the respondents would
submit that there will not be any alienation or encumbrance
till the disposal of the appeal.
4.Recording the aforesaid submission, C.M.P.No.18331 of
2017 stands ordered accordingly. Insofar as C.M.P.No.18332
of 2017 is concerned, any construction or alteration made is
subject to the result of the appeal. C.M.P.No.18332 of 2017
is disposed of accordingly.
Post the main appeal for final hearing on 09