SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
MOHANAMBAL – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S V RAGHAVACHARI', '', 'V SRIMATHI', 'V LAKSHMINARAYANAN', 'M/S R BALACHANDERAN', '', 'V G GUHAN MURUGAN', 'V TAMIZH SELVAN', 'COUNSEL', 'SOLE RESPONDENT']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Judgment Reserved on : 02.08.2018

Judgment Pronounced on : 09.11.2018

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

C.M.S.A.No.16 of 2018

and CMP.No.12748 of 2018

1. Rajendran

2. M.Murugan

... Appellants

Vs

Mohanambal

... Respondent

Prayer :- Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under

Section 100 read with Order 21 Rule 103 of CPC, against the

order and decretal Order dated 19.06.2018 passed in

C.M.A.No.12 of 2017 on the file of the Subordinate Judge,

Kanchipuram in E.A.No.52 of 2013 in E.P.No.24 of 2009 in

O.S.No.71 of 1976 on the file of the District Munsif cum

Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur.

For Appellants

: Mr.V.Raghavachari

For Respondent

: Mr.R.Balachandran

JUDGMENT

The obstructors before the Execution Court in E.A.52 of 2013

in E.P.24 of 2009, having lost successively both before the

Execution Court and the first appellate Court have come

forward with the present appeal.

2. There then exists a set of facts that provides the

setting for the appellants to approach the Execution Court.

They may now be introduced:

The property involved in this appeal is a specific plot

re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top