Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
MADRAS HIGH COURT
A. RAVI – Appellant
Versus
MR. G.R. KANAGARAJ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.07.2018 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Contempt Petition No.785 of 2018 A.Ravi ... Petitioner Vs.
Mr.G.R.Kanagaraj, President, Rep.by the Management K.2069, Veerakeralam Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank, Veerakeralam, Coimbatore – 641 007. Now Society called as K.2069, Veerakeralam Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Veerakeralam, Coimbatore – 641 007.
...Respondent Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent herein for his willful disobedience and non-compliance of the orders of this Hon'ble Court made in W.P.No.6413 of 2004, dated
06.01.2012 under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram Special Government Pleader (Co-operatives)
O R D E R https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcseTrvihcees/ present Contempt Petition has be
The High Court emphasized that contempt applications must be filed within one year of the alleged contempt, adhering to statutory limitations while asserting selective exercise of inherent powers onl....
Any contempt proceedings initiated must comply with the one-year limitation period stipulated under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, barring exceptional circumstances.
The limitation prescribed under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act cannot go against the constitutional mandate contained in Article 215 of the Constitution. The court emphasized that the mere ....
Contempt of court conviction requires proof beyond reasonable doubt; courts have inherent power to ensure justice, unaffected by procedural timelines in cases of fraud.
The Supreme Court reaffirmed that contempt proceedings are subject to strict limitation periods, and the concept of a continuing wrong does not apply to single acts of non-compliance with court order....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article