Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, C.KUMARAPPAN, JJ
Manaksha – Appellant
Versus
The Additional Chief Secretary, Pollution Control Impact Assessment Body – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners sought relief against unauthorized canteen construction in crz. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court observed clear crz violations by the canteen construction, warranting removal. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. directive for further inspections and compliance verification. (Para 9 , 10) |
(Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)
The present writ petitions are stated to be filed in public interest, seeking a mandamus directing the official respondents to cancel the approval granted for construction of a canteen in the Costal Regulation Zone (CRZ), and remove the same.
2. The admitted location of the canteen is within 100 to 500 metres at the Fish Landing Centre of Uvari Coastal Village, Uvari, Tirunelveli District.
3. On 09.09.2025, we had passed an order of status quo and we come to understand today, that the order of status quo has not been complied with by the Parish Priest, Uvari Parish, Tirunelveli District/R6.
4. We had also called for a Status Report from the Assistant Director of Fisheries, Tirunelveli/R3, and the Report, filed on 22.09.2025 states as follows:-
‘I humbly Submit to state that I am 4th respondent and I have issued letter notice on 18.08.2025 to 6th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
