SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 58289

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Dr.Justice ANITA SUMANTH
VEDANTA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


COMMON JUDGMENT

(Per :- Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)

This common order disposes 32 matters, 19 Writ Appeals and 13 Writ Petitions, nine pertaining to the Principal seat and four pertaining to the Madurai Bench.

2. The Writ Appeals challenge various orders of the Writ Court, the first of which has been passed in the case of State of Tamil Nadu and others V. Dalmia Cements (Bharath) Ltd. and others, [1W.P.Nos.4373 of 2000 dated 20.11.2019]. In all the writ petitions, the prayers were either for Writs of Certiorari or Certiorarified Mandamus challenging the demands raised by the respondents under the provisions of Section 72 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 (in short ‘Rules’) in relation to levy of surface compensation to the State, in respect of the mines operated by the appellants/petitioners.

3. In all cases, it is the private party/lessee, which is the petitioner/appellant before us, and by and large, the State has been arrayed as the first respondent and the Revenue authorities of the respective Districts have been arrayed as the subsequent respondents.

4. The detailed submissions of Mr.R.Sankara Narayanan and Mr.Srinath Sridevan, learned Senior Counsel, both appearing for Mr.AR.Ramanat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top