SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 58886

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
Axis Bank Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Markapudi Ajay Kumar – Respondent
Arb Appln No. 813 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Applicant(s): M/s.Uma Vijayan M.R.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Vasanth Kumar

A lender can initiate repossession of a vehicle through an Advocate Commissioner under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act if a default in loan repayment occurs.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9 - Repossession of vehicle - Application for appointment of Advocate Commissioner filed as respondent defaulted repayment of loan - Court finds a prima facie case for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to repossess vehicle, and further orders initiated arbitration process to resolve disputes. (Paras 1, 2, and 3)

Facts of the case:
This application was filed to appoint an Advocate Commissioner for repossession of the vehicle, since the respondent defaulted in loan repayment, having paid only 27 out of 60 installments leading to an amount in arrears of Rs.1,45,072/-.

Findings of Court:
The court found sufficient basis to appoint an Advocate Commissioner and defined the approach to repossess the vehicle while ensuring the respondent's rights.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant had a right to repossess the vehicle due to loan default and the proper procedure to follow.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that under the loan agreement, the applicant has the right to repossess the vehicle, confirming the procedure for appointing the Advocate Commissioner for the process.

Result: Application disposed of with specific directions concerning the repossession.

PRAYER To appoint an Advocate Commissioner to take custody of the Vehicle being MARUTI CAT CMARUTI BALENO bearing Chassis No.MBHEWB22SLM598287 fitted with Engine No.K12MP4135204 and Reg.No.AO39HT7970 from the Respondent or wherever it is found and deliver it to the applicant with liberty to sell and to premit the Advocate Commissioner to obtain police aid and to break open the premises within which the said vehicle is lying and pass orders.

For Applicant(s): M/s.Uma Vijayan M.R.

For Mr. Vasanth Kumar, Respondent(s): Advocate Commissioner Court Notice Await Services

ORDER

When the application came up for hearing on 24.06.2025, this Court passed the following order:-

This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act , seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner by this Court to repossess the vehicle, morefully described in the schedule to the judges summon from the respondent or wherever available.

2.The respondent is a defaulter in re-payment of the loan to the applicant. The respondent had availed loan for the purchase of vehicle. The respondent has paid only 27 installments out of 60 instalments, which are due and payable to the applicant as on date. As on date, 6 installments are in arrears, which amounts to Rs.1,45,072/-. The applicant has already recalled the loan by issuing notice to the respondent. Under the loan agreement, the applicant is empowered to re-possess the vehicle from the respondent in case the respondent commits default. The applicant has expressed its difficulty in re-possessing the vehicle on their own. Only under the said circumstances, the applicant has filed this application seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner by this Court. In the loan agreement, there exists an arbitration clause. The applicant has expressed its willingness to go for arbitration in accordance with the arbitration clause.

3.Supporting documents have been filed by the applicant in support of this application. Since a prima facie case has been made out by the applicant for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner, this Court is inclined to appoint an Advocate Commissioner as prayed for in this application. To enable the respondent to take back possession of the vehicle from the Advocate Commissioner, they must be put on terms for getting back the vehicle from the applicant after re-possession. In order to strike a balance, the following order is passed by this Court:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top