Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
J.Rajeshkumar – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Government, Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner appointed and transferred without consent. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. legal arguments focus on consent requirements. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on legality of transfer. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
ORDER
By consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
2.The writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent herein in Na.Ka.No. 29537/VSC3/2025 (Serial No.2) dated 04.08.2025 and the subsequent impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No. 4155/A1/2025-1 dated 05.08.2025 and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to retain the petitioner to continue his service in the 2nd respondents Department.
3. The petitioner was appointed as Veterinary Assistant Surgeon in the 2nd respondent on 15.11.1998. After serving at various places, he is now working as Assistant Director of Animal Husbandry, Dindigul in the 2nd respondent department, on promotion vide order dated 20.03.2024 While so, vide impugned order dated 04.08.2025, the petitioner was transferred on deputation from the post of Assistant Director of Animal Husbandry Dindigul to Department of Milk Production &
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
