Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. Justice R.N. Manjula, J
A.G. Ponmanickavel – Appellant
Versus
State through the Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on idol theft cases and regulatory history (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. legal implications of section 195 cr.p.c. on judicial processes (Para 12 , 14 , 31) |
| 3. details surrounding the challenge and filing of the fir (Para 18 , 20 , 30) |
| 4. judicial examination of alleged malicious prosecution (Para 84) |
| 5. court's decision to quash fir and related proceedings (Para 115) |
COMMON ORDER
Crl.O.P.No.2263 of 2025: This Original Petition has been filed to call for the records of the impugned unnumbered docket order dated 17.12.2024 passed by the Hon'ble Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai which rejected the petitioner’s prayer to furnish a copy of the preliminary report filed by the respondent, in connection with FIR in RC0502024S0013 dated 08.08.2024.
Crl.O.P.No.4583 of 2025: This Original Petition, has been filed to call for the records of the impugned FIR in Crime No.RC0502024S0013 st dated 08.08.2024 on the file of the 1 respondent and quash the same as illegal.
PART-I Short background of the facts leading to these Petitions: -
1. The parties are referred as their rank in Crl.O.P. 2263 of 2025 for the sake of convenient discussion. The petitio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
