SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 59140

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. Justice R.N. Manjula, J
A.G. Ponmanickavel – Appellant
Versus
State through the Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
Crl.O.P.(MD) Nos.4583 and 2263 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar, Mr.M.Pozhilan
For the Respondents: Mr.K.Srinivasan, Mr.D.Mohideen Basha, Mr.L.Infant Dinesh

The court emphasized the necessity of judicial permission for transferring investigations and the legal framework surrounding official misconduct in criminal cases, protecting the integrity of investigative processes.

Headnote:(A) The Constitution of India - Article 49 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 195 - Investigation of idol theft cases - Government order transferring investigation to CBI quashed on grounds of lack of jurisdiction and procedural violations; unimpeachable conduct of the investigating officer emphasized. (Paras 1, 5, 9, 12, 104, 115)

(B) Criminal Investigation - Authority and discretion of designated officers - Misuse of power in transferring cases not permissible without proper legal basis - The capacity of the State agency to investigate idol theft properly confirmed. (Paras 23, 45, 112)

(C) Criminal Procedure Code - Sections Related to false evidence and official misconduct examined; certain offences actionable only under Section 195, stressing the need for judicial intervention to prevent obstructions in ongoing investigations. (Paras 103, 112)

(D) Role of the Investigation Officer - Discretion exercised in the best interest of justice and meticulous adherence to legal obligations, maintenance of public trust paramount. (Paras 34, 112)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a former police officer, challenged the legality of an FIR and charges stemming from allegations of misconduct during idol theft investigations, asserting no substantiated evidence supported claims against him.

Findings of Court:
The court found the FIR legally unsustainable due to the lack of specified charges and granted relief by quashing the related proceedings.

Issues: Whether the transfer of investigation to CBI contravened established legal precedents and whether the petitioner’s rights were grossly violated by the actions of the investigating agency.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled in favor of preserving the integrity of the ongoing investigations led by the petitioner, highlighting potential misuse of authority in transferring the case and emphasizing the obligation of the State to adhere to judicial orders.

Result: Petitions allowed; FIR and associated proceedings quashed.

Table of Content
1. background on idol theft cases and regulatory history (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. legal implications of section 195 cr.p.c. on judicial processes (Para 12 , 14 , 31)
3. details surrounding the challenge and filing of the fir (Para 18 , 20 , 30)
4. judicial examination of alleged malicious prosecution (Para 84)
5. court's decision to quash fir and related proceedings (Para 115)

COMMON ORDER

Crl.O.P.No.2263 of 2025: This Original Petition has been filed to call for the records of the impugned unnumbered docket order dated 17.12.2024 passed by the Hon'ble Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai which rejected the petitioner’s prayer to furnish a copy of the preliminary report filed by the respondent, in connection with FIR in RC0502024S0013 dated 08.08.2024.

Crl.O.P.No.4583 of 2025: This Original Petition, has been filed to call for the records of the impugned FIR in Crime No.RC0502024S0013 st dated 08.08.2024 on the file of the 1 respondent and quash the same as illegal.

PART-I Short background of the facts leading to these Petitions: -

1. The parties are referred as their rank in Crl.O.P. 2263 of 2025 for the sake of convenient discussion. The petitioner Mr.A.G. Ponmanickavel is a former Inspector General of Police who served in Idol Wing – CID in the State of Tamil Nadu and retired from service on 30.11.2018. He was appointed as a Special Officer to head the Idol Wing – CID, Chennai to deal with the cases of theft of idols and antiques in all stages for a period of one year subsequent to his superannuation on 30.11.2018 vide the order of this court passed in the two Public Interest Litigations in W.P.Nos.20392 & 20963 of 2018 to quash the order passed by the Government of Tamil Nadu in G.O.Ms.No.885, Home (Supreme Court) Department dated 01.08.2018. Through the said Government order the investigation of the cases relating to theft of idols and artefacts of various temples which were then investigated by a Special Team headed by the Joint Commissioner of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Mayiladuthurai, Nagapattinam District were ordered to be transferred to CBI.

2. Earlier, a common order came to be passed in Crl.O.P.Nos.8690 & 12060 of 2017 on 21.07.2017. Both the Criminal Original Petitions have been filed by persons who are public voices. The petitioner in Crl.O.P.No. 8960/2017 had alleged that the ancient idols in ancient temples in Thanjavur District worth several crores of rupees were moved and stocked unofficially against the H.R. & C.E. norms and the trustees along with the Executive Officers of H.R. & C.E. Department created records as though the idols are intact, when factually six idols out of which, five belonging to various temples were missing. Instead of keeping the idols in the ICON centre, they were kept in an unauthorised tunnel and also in a scrap room belonging to the Public Works Department. Despite numerous complaints have been given, no action was taken. As the sixth respondent therein is not the appropriate authority to investigate the offence of theft, directions have been sought.

3. The other petition in Crl.O.P.12060 of 2017 has been filed for seeking a relief to transfer the investigation of case in Cr.No.1 of 2017 on the file of the Idol Theft Wing – CID, Chennai to Crime Branch – CID, Chennai, for further investigation. The allegations made by the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.12060/2017, is that the second respondent of this petitions namely Mr.Kader Batcha, the then Deputy Superintendent of Police, Subburaj, Inspector of Police and another police personnel, who formed part of the Idol Wing, came into possession of 6 idols during the course of their investigation of a case from one Arokiyaraj and sold the two of the idols namely Sivagami Amman Panchaloka Idol and one Siva and Parvathy Panchaloka Idol on a pedestal to Dinadayalan, to a notorious smuggler for Rs.15 Lakhs which in turn, were allegedly sold for Rs.6 Crores. Despite FIR has been lodged agai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top