Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Srimathy, J
S.Marnattan – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector General of Reg – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. refusal to register a settlement deed based on alleged noncompliance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details regarding prior land transactions by the petitioner. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
ORDER
This writ petition is filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the refusal check slip dated 08.01.2025 and further direct the 2nd respondent to register the settlement deed dated 07.01.2025.
2. Through the impugned order, the 2nd respondent has refused to reg-
ister the settlement deed on the ground that the petitioner has not obtained approv- al for the layout, hence registration would be against Section 22 (A)(2) of the Reg-
istration Act.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner purchased an extent of 85 cents in S.No.18/10 vide Document No. 2559/2017 dated 06.12.2017. Then purchased 18½ cents in S.No.18/16A vide Document No.681/2018 dated 09.04.2018.
4. Then the petitioner had executed registered settlement deed in Document No.1055/2020 dated 17.07.2020 to his 3rd daughter wherein he had set-
tled centre portion admeasuring 972 square feet in S.No.18/16A.
5. Then the petitioner had executed registered sale deed in Document No.2389/2024
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
