IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
A.Augustin – Appellant
Versus
Mari @ Maria Susai Tmt.Sowriammal @ Anthoniammal – Respondent
COMMON JUDGMENT
The Appeal Suit No.14 of 2019 had been filed against the common judgment and decree passed by learned XVI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai made in O.S.No.7469 of 2010, dated 22.03.2018.
2. The Appeal Suit No.15 of 2019 had been filed against the common judgment and decree passed by learned XVI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai made in O.S.No.6200 of 2008, dated 22.03.2018.
3. The brief facts which are essential to decide the Appeals are as follows:
3.1. The suit schedule properties were allotted to one Munusamy, the father of the Plaintiff and the Defendant in O.S.No.6200 of 2008 and father of the Plaintiff and the Defendants 2 to 4 in O.S.No.7469 of 2010. The Defendant in O.S.No.6200 of 2008 is the Plaintiff in O.S.No.7469 of 2010. O.S.No.7469 of 2010 had been filed for relief of declaration that the settlement deed dated 18.03.2005 executed by the mother of the Plaintiff and the Defendants in O.S.No.7469 of 2010 in favour of Defendant-2 in O.S.No.7469 of 2010 as null and void, bearing Document No.1244 of 2005 on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Kodambakkam and for consequential relief of partition and separate possession of 'A' Schedule property.
3.2


Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.