Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
A.Augustin – Appellant
Versus
Mari @ Maria Susai Tmt.Sowriammal @ Anthoniammal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 3) |
| 2. plaintiff's claims and relief sought. (Para 4) |
| 3. defendant's defenses and claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. defendant's additional assertions. (Para 8) |
| 5. summary of respective claims and roles of the parties. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. issues framed by the trial court. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. introduction and structure of appeal. (Para 15) |
| 8. comment on the legality of the proceedings. (Para 16) |
| 9. background and analysis of the property allocation. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 10. appellant's contentions and their supports. (Para 19 , 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 11. final judgment and reasoning. (Para 36 , 42 , 44 , 46 , 70) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
The Appeal Suit No.14 of 2019 had been filed against the common judgment and decree passed by learned XVI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai made in O.S.No.7469 of 2010, dated 22.03.2018.
2. The Appeal Suit No.15 of 2019 had been filed against the common judgment and decree passed by learned XVI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai made in O.S.No.6200 of 2008, dated 22.03.2018.
3. The brief facts which are essential to decide the Appeals are as follows:
3.1. The suit schedule properties were allotted to one Munusamy, the f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
