Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
R.Elumalai – Appellant
Versus
R.Mangathammal (died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. description of joint family properties (Para 2) |
| 2. defendants' admissions and denials (Para 3) |
| 3. plaintiff's claim over ancestral property (Para 4) |
| 4. legal proceedings history (Para 5) |
| 5. plaintiff’s arguments regarding property claims (Para 6 , 8) |
| 6. previous suit findings (Para 7) |
| 7. court's rejection of plaintiff's claims (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. assessment of evidence and reasoning by the court (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. existence and implications of the settlement deeds (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. final judgment based on legal precedents (Para 28 , 29) |
| 11. call for evidence and admissions in court (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 12. final declarations and consequences (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 13. res judicata and abuse of process rulings (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 28.09.2012 in A.S.No.45 of 2011 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Villupuram confirming the Judgment and Decree dated
25.04.2011 in O.S.No.1 of 2009 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Gingee.
2. The plaint averments in brief are as follows:-
2.1. The Plaintiff and Defendants 2 and 3 are the children born to the first Defendant Man
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
