IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR. SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
Kamatchy – Appellant
Versus
Srinivasan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details surrounding property ownership and prior assessments. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. lawful conduct of municipality and the applicability of specific acts. (Para 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal had been filed against the judgment and decree dated 07.01.2013 in A.S.No.84 of 2011 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Poonamallee, confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.06.2011 in O.S.No.250 of 2007 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Poonamallee.
2. T he p laint averments in brief are as follows:
2.1. The Plaintiff owned the schedule mentioned house, ground and premises. The Plaintiff submitted that originally in or about the year 1958, one Mr.Narayanasamy Reddiar had acquired the suit site by occupation and put up structures for habitation purposes. He continued to possess and enjoy the suit property during his life time. After the life time of Narayanasamy Reddiar, his son Padmasekara Reddy and Narayanasamy Reddiar's wife Jayalakshmi Ammal were in possession and enjoyment till they had sold and delivered the same to one Mrs. Kasthuri under a sale deed dated 25.09.1972. The said Mrs.Kasthuri in turn had sold and delivered the suit prope
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.