Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, L.VICTORIA GOWRI, JJ
Thangasamy – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on statutory violation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. summary of prosecution's case. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. defense arguments challenging evidence. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. prosecution's evidence validated. (Para 7) |
| 5. evidence reviewed, conviction affirmed. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. legal standards on sexual assault evaluation. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 7. understanding of pocso act provisions. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 8. delay in filing complaint not fatal. (Para 15 , 17) |
| 9. age of victims substantiates charges. (Para 16 , 19 , 20) |
| 10. court's role as final fact-finder. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 11. affirmed charges and implications for appellant. (Para 23) |
| 12. final decision on appeal. (Para 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT
P.VELMURUGAN , J. ,
This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Special Court for trial of cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur in Spl.S.C.No. 33 of 2015, dated 18.02.2022.
2. By the above judgment the trial Court had convicted the appellant and sentenced him, as detailed below:
| Penal Provisions | Sentence of Imprisonment | Fine Amount |
| 506(i) of IPC | Two years imprisonment | Rs.1000/-each i/d to undergo six month im |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
