Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Justice R.Vijayakumar, Mrs. Justice J.Nisha Banu, Mrs. Justice S.Srimathy, JJ
S.Paramasivam – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Madurai District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of writ petitions. (Para 1 , 5 , 6 , 12) |
| 2. contentions regarding animal sacrifice. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 3. counterarguments from dhargah administration. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. judicial findings on animal sacrifice. (Para 23 , 24 , 30) |
| 5. legal arguments about the historicity of claims. (Para 32 , 34) |
| 6. final order of the court. (Para 107) |
COMMON ORDER
The above said writ petitions were tagged together and heard by the Hon'ble Division Bench of Mrs.Justice J.Nisha Banu and Mrs.Justice S.Srimathy. Out of these writ petitions, both the learned Judges were pleased to concur and dismissed WP(MD).Nos.3701 of 2025, 8523 of 2017 and 23198 of 2023.
2.As far as the other three writ petitions are concerned, there was a divergent opinion. The learned Judge Mrs.Justice J.Nisha Banu had dismissed all the three writ petitions and Mrs.Justice S.Srimathy has allowed these three writ petitions. In view of cleavage of opinion between the two Judges, the matter was placed before the Hon'ble Chief Justice for nominating the third Judge. Thus, these writ petitions are listed before this Court.
3. Since both the learned Judges have concurred and dismis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
