Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
M.Mohamed Jaffer – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar, Madurai West Circle, Madurai District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to survey notice based on prior inquiry requirement. (Para 1) |
| 2. consideration of objections and property title dispute. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court directed inquiry and timelines for resolution. (Para 4) |
ORDER
A survey notice is challenged in this writ petition on the ground that no enquiry was conducted in terms of the earlier order dated 03.06.2025 in W.P(MD)No.15081 of 2025.
2.Learned Government Advocate submits on behalf of the first and second respondents that the petitioner's objections would be considered and a speaking order would be issued in respect thereof.
3.Learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that the said respondent has title to the relevant property and that patta also stands in her name.
4.The earlier order of this Court directed the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass final orders on merits after issuing notice to the 6th respondent therein, who is the petitioner's sister. Therefore, it is necessary that the Tahsildar and Surveyor concerned hold an inquiry before taking a decision in the matter. By directing the Tahsildar to hold such inquiry and provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, the 3rd
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
