Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 60545
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.KUMARESH BABU, J
Vijayakumar P – Appellant
Versus
The Director, The Indian Institute of Management, Tiruchirappalli – Respondent
WP(MD). No.25647 of 2025 | WMP(MD)No.20073 of 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.Jessi Jeeva Priya
For the Respondents:
Withdrawal of writ petition is permissible without the need for reasons.
Headnote:This Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for the quashing of an impugned result notification dated 02.07.2025. The court recorded the petitioner's request for withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. Costs were not awarded.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. court acknowledges withdrawal request. (Para 2) |
| 3. writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 3) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 08/10/2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU WP(MD). No.25647 of 2025 and WMP(MD)No.20073 of 2025 Vijayakumar P, ... Petitioner Vs
1. The Director, The Indian Institute of Management, Tiruchirappalli, Pudukkottai Main Road, Chinna Sooriyur Village, Tiruchirappalli District.
2. The Chief Administrative Officer, I/c, the Indian Institute of Management, Tiruchirappalli, Pudukkottai Main Road, Chinna Sooriyur Village, Tiruchirappalli District. ... Respondents PRAYER :-
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned result notification dated 02.07.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent relating to the 3 posts namely Assistant Administrative Officer, Administrative Assistant and Junior Assistant and to quash the same and consequentially direct the 2nd respondent to publish the result notification based on merits.
For Petitioner : P.Jessi Jeeva Priya, Advocate.
ORDER
This Writ petition is listed today (08.10.2025), under the caption 'for withdrawal'.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has circulated a letter to the registry stating that the petitioner wants to withdrawal this Writ Petition.
3. Recording the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.
