Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
V. Adhikesavan – Appellant
Versus
State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Special Police Establishment, Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on fraudulent recruitment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against procedural violations in recruitment. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's analysis of prosecution evidence. (Para 5) |
| 4. final judgment and consequences. (Para 6 , 7) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
A. The Appeals:
1. These appeals originate from the judgment dated 28.03.2014 made in C.C.No.6 of 2009 on the file of the IX Additional Special Judge for CBI cases, Chennai. By that judgment, two accused, who are involved in the case, namely Accused No.1 - V. Adikesavan and Accused No.2 - Vijay Anand, were found guilty in the following manner.
| Accused | Under Section | Sentence |
| A1 | Found guilty and convicted for the offence under Sections 420 & 409 IPC and under Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. | Sentenced to undergo RI for one and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, i/d to undergo RI for two months for the offence u/s 420 IPC. Sentenced to undergo RI for one year |
| Accused | Under Section | Sentence |
| and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, i/d to undergo RI for two months for the offence u/s 409 IPC. Sentenced to undergo RI for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, i/d to undergo RI for two months for the offence u/s 13(2 | ||
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
