Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
K.Kumar Deshraj – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, CBI/ACB/Chennai.RC No.51(A)/2003/CBI/ACB/CHENNAI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of offences charged against the accused (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. trial court's findings and acquittals (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. interpretation of rbi rules regarding note refunds (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. analysis of alleged misconduct and evidence (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. conclusion on dishonesty and conviction basis (Para 19 , 20) |
| 7. final decision on the appeal (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Appeal challenges the judgment of the XI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CBI Cases relating to Banks and Financial Institutions), Chennai – 600 001, dated 21.01.2014 in C.C.No.27 of 2005. In that case, four accused were tried in total. Accused Nos. 2 to 4 were acquitted of all charges. The first accused was also acquitted of the charges under Section 120B read with Section 4 20 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13 (2) read with (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 . However, the first accused, Kumar Deshraj, was found guilty of an offence under Section 4 20 of the and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
