Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Jothiraman, J
D.Suresh Jain – Appellant
Versus
Vinod R. Doishi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the tenant is challenging the landlord's eviction claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court addresses procedural issues regarding lease registration and maintainability of petitions. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments on both sides are presented regarding prior judicial decisions. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. the court affirms the rent court's decision to dismiss the application and uphold proper tenancy regulation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
O R D E R
The unsuccessful tenant has preferred the present civil revision petition.
2. The landlord has filed an application under Section 21 (2)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenants Act, 2017 as amended by Act XXXIX of 2018 in R.L.T.O.P.No.326 of 2025 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) to vacate the premises of the scheduled property in a proper condition immediately due to breach of the lease agreement dated 01.03.2022. While pending the R.L.T.O.P proceedings, the revision petitioner/tenant has approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in C.R.P.No.4024 of 2025 to strike off the proceedings in R.L.T.O.P.No.326 of 2015 pending on the file of the XIV Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. This Cou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
