IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.Sakthivel, J
B.Yamunarani – Appellant
Versus
P.Senthil – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs claim property rights. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. defendant's petition against ex parte decree. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court allows petition subject to conditions. (Para 15 , 16) |
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the order dated June
24, 2020 passed in I.A.No.201 of 2018 in O.S.No.135 of 2014 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Gudiyattam, Vellore District.
2.The respondents 1 to 3 herein are the plaintiffs, the respondents 4 to 6 herein are the defendants 1 to 3 and the Revision Petitioner herein is the fourth defendant in O.S.No.135 of 2014 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Gudiyattam, Vellore District (hereinafter referred to as 'Trial Court').
3.For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as per their array in the Original Suit.
4.The plaintiffs have filed a suit for partition. The case of the plaintiffs is that the first defendant is the father of the plaintiff. The suit property was purchased by their mother, viz., Banumathi vide registered sale deed dated July 17, 1985. The plaintiff's mother, Banumathi died intestate on December 06, 1987 leaving behind the plaintiffs and the first defendant as her legal heirs to succe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.