IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. R.N. Manjula, J
Bethel Estates Private Limited. – Appellant
Versus
P.Guru Vittal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims originate from a finalized partition decree. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. acquisition of property during litigation does not confer rights. (Para 5 , 9) |
| 3. finality of decrees must be respected in legal claims. (Para 10 , 12) |
COMMON ORDER
These applications have been filed by third party applicants who claim themselves having interest in the suit property.
2. Before proceeding to the merits of the applications filed by the applicants, it should be made clear as to the stage of the proceedings in C.S.No.6/1968. The suit in C.S.No.6/1968 is a suit filed by the plaintiffs for claiming partition. In the said suit a preliminary decree has been passed on 19.06.1989 by determining the share of the plaintiffs as 4/5 in the western half of premises No.26, Ramanan Street, Madras-1 and 4/5th share in the house site measuring 36 grounds purchased under Ex.B29 in R.S.No.1 Rangarajapuram, Puliyur Village and 4/5th share in the Gold Jewellery seized by the Income Tax Department.
3. The above suit in C.S.No.6/1968 has been filed by the plaintiffs for a decree for dissolution and rendering accounts of the partnership business “P.P.C. & Sons” and all his business viz., Padmanaba Talkies,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.