SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 61069

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, J
V. Meganathan – Appellant
Versus
State represented by Tiruppur South Police Station – Respondent
CRL OP No. 26973 of 2025 | Crl.M.P.No.18432 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.V.Parthiban
For the Respondents:Mr.R.Vinothraja for R1 Government Advocate (Crl.side)

The court ruled that ongoing investigation does not justify coercive measures against the accused when allegations mainly target another individual.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petition was filed under Section 528 of BNSS and r/w Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Facts of the Case: The petitioner seeks to quash FIR in Crime No. 339 of 2025 regarding a fraudulent admission scheme.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the allegations primarily targeted another accused, with no coercive steps against the petitioner.

Issues: Key questions include the validity of the allegations and petitioner's involvement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court stated 'no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner', indicating the lack of substantial evidence against the petitioner.

Result: 'The present Petition is dismissed.'

Table of Content
1. filing of petition to quash fir. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's decision on allegations and coercive measures. (Para 3)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR CRL OP No. 26973 of 2025 &

Crl.M.P.No.18432 of 2025 V.Meganathan Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. State represented by Tiruppur South Police Station, Tiruppur City, Crime No.339 of 2025

2.K.Mani Respondent(s)

PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS and r/w Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in connection with Crime Number 339 of 2025 and quash the first information report registered against the petitioner.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Parthiban For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Vinothraja for R1 Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in connection with the Crime number 339 of 2025 and quash the first information report registered against the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the 1st respondent and perused the documents placed on record.

3. A perusal of the First Information Report clearly indicates that as if A.1 received the amount to get admission in Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan. Accordingly, the defacto complainant paid the amount of Rs.5,00,000/- . However, later the defact complainant came to know that fake order has been issued, therefore, admission has been cancelled. That apart, the First Information Report also indicates that the amount has also been received by the present petitioner/A.3, except implicating the petitioner's name in the last paragraph, entire allegations are targeted against A.1.

In such view of the matter, let the investigation shall continue, however, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner and the present Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top