Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Manikandaprabu – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar, Virugambakkam Sub Registrar Office – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners sought adoption registration after refusal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. consent of biological father deemed unnecessary. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's interpretation of adoption law regarding abandonment. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's directive to register the adoption deed. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER
This writ has been filed by the petitioner seeking to call for the records relating to the impugned proceeding of the respondent in refusal check slip No.RFL/ Virugambakkam/ 7 2025 dated 31.05.2025 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to registrar the deed of Adoption dated
31.05.2025 excused by the 2nd respondent to in favour of 1st respondent.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 2nd petitioner intended to give her 14 years old minor son for adoption to her sister and the 1st petitioner, who is the husband of the 2nd petitioner's sister and executed the adoption deed dated 12.05.2025. However, when the adoption deed was presented for registration before the respondent, the respondent refused to register the same vide the refusal check slip dated 31.05.2025 on the ground that the consent of the biological father has not been obtained for gi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
