Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR. M.DHANDAPANI, J
K.Ananthan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge alienation of temple lands. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. reclassification of lands for court complex is disputed. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. legal arguments against reclassification presented. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court mandates adherence to hr & ce act for alienation. (Para 35 , 36 , 38 , 40) |
ORDER
By the present the petitioners seek to forbear the respondents from alienating or encroaching upon the lands, which is a temple property belonging to Arulmighu Karumbayiram Ayyanar for any purpose.
2. It is the case of the petitioners that they are devotees of Arulmighu Karumbayiram Ayyanar and that the temple and the deity there are situated in Udayankudikadu Village, Sendurai Taluk. It is the further case of the petitioners that the deity was consecrated in inam lands admeasuring 7 Acres and 36 cents comprised in Survey No.60 of Sendurai Village and the temple is situated in the middle of the large extent of land. It is the further case of the petitioners that the ownership of the extent of lands with the deity is reflected in the ‘A’ Register of the Village of Sendurai, part of the then Tiruchirappalli District before its bifurcation. It is the furth
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
