Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.Jothiraman, J
S.Baharathkanna – Appellant
Versus
G.Ashwini @ Preethi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details surrounding the domestic violence case and application submitted. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. emphasis on the right to defend and address the principle of natural justice. (Para 5 , 9) |
| 3. court allows re-evaluation of the dismissal under specific conditions. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 4. final order and conclusion of the revision petition. (Para 12) |
ORDER
The unsuccessful husband has preferred the petition. The respondent/wife G.Ashwini @ Preethi filed the complaint in DVC.No.64 of 2023, against the revision petitioner and his mother on the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Egmore, Chennai, wherein the revision petitioner was set exparte on 14.08.2023. Therefore, the revision petitioner/husband filed an application in Crl.M.P.No.292 of 2024 in DVC.No.64 of 2023 to set aside the exparte order dated 14.08.2023.
2. Upon hearing either side, the learned Additional Mahila Judge, Egmore, Chennai, vide order dated 05.06.2024, allowed the petition on condition that the revision petitioner/husband shall pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- as cost to the respondent/wife on or before 15.06.2024, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed automatically and the case was posted for complia
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
