IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.Sounthar, J
R.Natarajan – Appellant
Versus
Amit L.Shah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing property ownership requires credible legal documentation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. ownership claims based solely on speculative purchases lack legal standing. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
For Appellants : Mr.G.Jermaiah for Mr.D.Krishnamoorthy For Respondents : Mr.K.Ravi Senior Advocate Assisted by Mr.R.Murugan for M/s.Rugan and Arya for R1 R2 and R3 dismissed vide order dated 17.04.2018 J U D G M E N T The unsuccessful defendants 2 and 4 are the appellants. The first respondent herein filed a suit seeking declaration that the first respondent/plaintiff and second respondent/3rd defendant were the owners of the suit property and for recovery of possession. The plaintiff also sought for a declaration that sale deeds dated 22.11.1996 in favour of first and second defendant were null and void. The trial Court granted a declaration that the suit property belonged to plaintiff and 3rd defendant. The sale deeds in favour of defendants 1 and 2 were declared as null and void. As far as relief of possession is concerned, the same was not pressed by the plaintiff. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree passed by the trial Court, the defendants 2 and 4 have come by way of this
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.