SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 61890

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUNDER MOHAN, J
Esakkimuthu – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15493 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.Veerapandi
For the Respondents: Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Mr.S.P.Naveen Kumar

The court quashed a final report due to a compromise between parties concerning charges under several provisions related to harassment.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks to quash the final report in C.C.No.2134 of 2025 filed for offences under Section 296(b), 351(3), 75 of BNS, 2023 and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. The parties confirmed a compromise entered into on 14th August 2025 regarding the disputes. Given the compromise and nature of the offences, the court held that no useful purpose would be served by continuing the trial. The final report in C.C.No.2134 of 2025 is quashed.

Table of Content
1. court emphasizes resolution through compromise. (Para 5)

ORDER

The petitioner seeks to quash the final report in C.C.No.2134 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tirunelveli District, which was filed for the offences under Section 296(b), 351(3), 75 of BNS, 2023 and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act , 2002. 2. The allegation in the final report is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant had a love affair; that when the parents of the defacto complainant arranged her marriage with another man, the petitioner came to the house of the defacto complainant, abused her in filthy language and threatened her of dire consequences and thus committed the aforesaid offences.

3. Admittedly, the petitioner and the second respondent are neighbours.

They have now entered into a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 14th August 2025 and the scanned copy of the compromise memo reads as follows:

4. The petitioner, namely, Esakkimuthu (Aadhaar No.3896 0215 4168)

and the second respondent, namely, Arthi (Aadhaar No.8077 0721 9671) are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.B.Esakkipandian, Special Sub Inspector of Police, Manur Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

Both the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them.

5. In view of the same and considering the nature of the offences and the compromise arrived between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned final report pending trial. Accordingly, the impugned final report in C.C.No.2134 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tirunelveli District is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top