Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUNDER MOHAN, J
Logadharsini – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and allegations fail to meet legal standards. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. legal analysis reveals insufficient evidence to uphold charges. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. final judgment quashes the prosecution based on lack of merit. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the final report in C.C.No.557 of 2022 filed for the offences under Section 294 (b), 506(1) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 .
2. The allegation in the impugned final report is that on 22.11.2018, the first petitioner/A1 had called the defacto complainant over phone and posing herself as the Director General of Police, she asked the defacto complainant to transfer her property to one Logadharsini, failing which, she would foist a false case against the defacto complainant under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act; that when the defacto complainant enquired about the said incident to the second petitioner/A2, who is the father of the said Logadarsini, he had abused the defacto complainant in filthy language in a public place.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the allegations even if taken at its face
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
