2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 88827
MADRAS HIGH COURT
V.JAYABALAN – Appellant
Versus
K.ROOPATHY SUDHAKAR – Respondent
CRL RC 768 2020
Crl.R.C.No.768 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21..04..2023
Coram
THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Criminal Revision Case No.768 of 2020
V.Jayabalan
..... Petitioner
-Versus-
K.Roopathy Sudhakar
..... Respondent
Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, praying to call for the records relating to the judgement dated
21.02.2020 made in C.A.No.57 of 2019 by the learned IV Additional District
and Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur at Ponneri, dismissing the appeal and
confirming the judgement and order dated 15.03.2019 made in S.T.C.No.311 of
2011 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottriyur, and set aside the same
by allowing this revision.
For Appellant
: Mr.R.Radha Pandian
For Respondent
: No Appearance
JUDGEMENT
This revision challenges the concurrent finding of conviction for the
offence u/s138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentence imposed thereof
by the courts below.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. There is no
1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.768 of 2020
representation for the respondent.
3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner states that pursuant to
the settlement arrived at between the parties in the mediation held on
08.08.2022, the revision petitioner/accused agreed to settle the dispute with the
respondent/complainant by paying a sum of Rs.3,30,000/- (Rupees Three
Lakhs and Thirty Thousand only) and agreed to permit the respondent to
withdraw the sum of Rs.2,60,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs and Sixty Thousand
only) already deposited into the court and lying in the credit of STC No.311 of
2011 on the fie of the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottriyur, and also agreed to
pay the balance sum of Rs.70,000/- (Rupees Seventy Thousand only) within a
period of two months from the date of settlement i.e., 07.02.2023.
Accordingly, a Demand Draft for Rs.70,000/- (Rupees Seventy Thousand only)
was drawn at Indian Overseas Bank, Thiruvottriyur Branch, in favour of the
respondent herein on 29.03.2023.
4. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the
Demand Draft has been received by the respondent on 14.04.2023. The copy of
the agreement dated 07.02.2023 has also been furnished which was signed by
the revision petitioner, the respondent and their respective counsel and
presented before the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Center on
2 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.768 of 2020
08.02.2023. Based on that, the mediation center has informed this court that
the parties have arrived at settlement in terms of the compromise.
5. Recording the above facts, this revision petition is disposed of as the
parties have compounded the offence and hence, STC No.311 of 2011 on the
file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottriyur, is closed as
compounded.
21..04..2023
Index
: yes / no
Neutral Citation
: yes / no
Speaking / Non Speaking Order
kmk
To
1.The IV Additional District and Sessions Judge,
Thiruvallur at Ponneri,
Thiruvallur District.
2.The Judicial Magistrate,
Thiruvottriyur,
Thiruvallur District.
3 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.768 of 2020
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN.J.,
kmk
Crl.R.C.No.768 of 2020
21..04..2023
4 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis