MADRAS HIGH COURT
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
P.VEERASAMY – Respondent
CMA 879 2020
C.M.A.No.879 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.04.2023
CORAM:
The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
C.M.A.No.879 of 2020
and CMP.No.5609 of 2020
The Divisional Manager,
United India Insurance Co., Ltd.,
Divisional Office, Durgabhavani Square,
Opp.Railway Station,
Denkanikottai Road,
Hosur 635 109. ... Appellant
vs.
1.P.Veerasamy
2.Haribabu ... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and decree dated 04.06.2019
made in M.C.O.P.No.255 of 2018 on the file of the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, ( Additional District Judge) Hosur.
For Appellant
: Mr.D.Bhaskaran
For R1 : M/s.Mukund R.Pandiyan
For R2 : No Appearance
1/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.879 of 2020
JUDGMENT
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed to set aside the Decree
and Judgment dated 04.06.2019 made in M.C.O.P.No.255 of 2018, on the
file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal ( Additional District Judge)
Hosur.
2. The said appeal is filed by the Insurance company
challenging the negligence as well as the quantum of compensation. The
parties will be referred to as per their ranking in the claim petition. For
the sake of convenience, the Appellant Insurance Company shall
hereinafter be referred to as “ The Appellant” and the 1st Respondent who
was the Claimant before the Claims Tribunal be referred to as the “
Claimant” and the 2nd respondent as 2nd respondent.
3. The claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, claiming a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- as compensation. The
claimant sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on
21.09.2015. As per the averments made in the claim petition, when the
claimant was travelling as a pillion rider in Hero Splendor Plus motorcycle
bearing Registration No.TN.70-H-5793 belonging to the second
2/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.879 of 2020
respondent on 21.09.2015, the motorcycle ridden by the 2nd respondent in
a rash and negligent manner was hit by an unknown tempo vehicle.
Consequently, the 2nd Respondent rider lost control of the motorcycle and
both the Claimant and the 2nd Respondent fell down and sustained injuries.
4. According to the claimant, he was a street vendor and
earning a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month by selling snacks on a push cart
by the road side. He was maintaining his family with the sum thus
earned. However, due to the accident he sustained injuries and suffered
disability that impaired his work and earning capacity. Therefore, the
claimant filed the claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- as
compensation for the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident.
5. The 2nd respondent remained ex parte before the Tribunal.
The claim was contested by the appellant herein who filed a detailed
counter disputing the nature of the accident, negligence, liability and
quantum.
6. Before the Claims Tribunal, the claimant examined himself as
3/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.879 of 2020
PW1 and Exs.P1 to P10 were marked. On the other hand, on behalf of
the appellant herein one witness was examined as R.W.1 and Exs.R1 to
R5 were marked.
7. The Claims Tribunal, on perusal of pleadings and thorough
Appraisal of the evidence adduced on record, awarded a sum of
Rs.9,82,498/- as compensation along with interest at the rate of 7.5% p.a.
to the claimant for the injuries sustained by him in the accident.
Aggrieved by the award of the Tribunal, the above appeal has been filed
by the Appellant insurance company.
8. The learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that the
Claims Tribunal failed to adjudicat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.