2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 93737
MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.PERUMAL – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO OP SOCIETIES – Respondent
WA 2217 2018
W.A.No.2217 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Orders Reserved on
Orders Pronounced on
28.8.2023
01.11.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
W.A.No.2217 of 2018
and C.M.P.No.17419 of 2018
M.Perumal
...
Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Deputy Registrar of Co-operation
Societies, Dharmapuri Circle,
Dharmapuri District.
2. The Co-op. Sub Registrar/Field Officer
(Pennagaram),
Section 81 Enquiry Officer,
S.6756 Ernahalli Primary Agricultural
Co-op. Credity Society, Ernahalli,
Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District.
3. The President,
S.6756 Ernahalli Primary Agricultural
Co-op. Credit Society, Ernahalli Post,
Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents/Respondents
Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order
dated 13.08.2018 passed in W.P.No.3402 of 2017.
1/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.2217 of 2018
For Appellants
: Mr.M.Vijay Anand
For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.U.M.Ravichandran, Spl. G.P.
For Respondent No.3 : L.P.Shanmugasundaram
*****
JUDGMENT
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.
The appellant was working as Secretary in the S.6756 Ernahalli
Primary Agricultural Co-op. Credit Society for the past 23 years. The first
respondent by proceedings in Na.Ka.3617/2010/E-1 dated 15.6.2010 ordered
enquiry under Sec.81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act.
Accordingly, enquiry was conducted and enquiry report was also filed. Based
on the enquiry officer findings, the appellant was suspended from service on
7.8.2014. Again, the first respondent by his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.3729/
2015/Tho.sa-1 dated 7.10.2015 has ordered Section 81 enquiry to be conducted
on the allegations of mismanagement and misuse of the bank account for the
very same period from 1.4.2014. Challenging the said proceedings of the first
respondent dated 7.10.2015, the appellant has filed the instant writ petition
before this Court.
2. The Writ Court while dismissing the writ petition, has held
that after passing the final orders under Sec.87 of the Act, the person
aggrieved has to approach the designated Cooperative Tribunal constituted
under Sec.152 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act. Aggrieved by the
said order, the appellant has filed the instant appeal before this Court.
2/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.2217 of 2018
3 The appellant raised several grounds in the appeal by stating
that the learned Single Judge failed to note that the appellant already suffered
punishments for the earlier enquiry conducted by the first respondent for the
very same proceedings. Whereas the first respondent's impugned enquiry
proceedings in Na.Ka.No.3729/2015/Tho.Sa.1 dated 7.10.2015 and its
supplement proceedings dated 18.11.2015 is also based on the very same
charges for which the appellant has already suffered punishment. The
appellant also raised a ground that the learned Single Judge failed to take note
of the subsequent events that took place between the appellant and the
respondents, such as previous enquiry conducted by the second respondent in
compliance with the order of the first respondent did not find any irregularity
or misappropriation as against the appellant. It is further contended by the
appellant that all the jewel loans were repaid by the members even before
the commencement of the first respondent's impugned enquiry proceedings in
Na.Ka.No.3729/2015/Tho.Sa.1 dated 7.10.2015 and its supplement proceedings
dated 18.11.2015. Therefore, the order passed by the learned Single Judge
dated 13.08.2018 passed in W.P.No.3402 of 2017 is liable to be set aside.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, learned
Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, learned
counsel appearing for the third r